Esparza
Esparza v. Kohls, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ESPARZA, individually and on Case No.: 23-cv-01988-AJB-KSC behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S v.
MOTION TO DISMISS
14 KOHL’S, INC., a Delaware corporation, (Doc. No. 4) d/b/a KOHLS.COM, Defendant.
17 Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Kohl’s, Inc.’s motion to dismiss 18 Plaintiff Miguel Esparza’s First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to the 20 motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 6), to which Defendant replied, (Doc. No. 7). Pursuant to 21 Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the instant matter suitable for determination on 22 the papers and without oral argument. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS 23 IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Miguel Esparza is a California resident who visited Defendant…