Wells

Wells v. Sanofi S.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20243:23-cv-02134California717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RACHAEL WELLS, Case No.: 23-CV-2134 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) STAYING CASE; (2)

v. VACATING DEADLINES; AND (3)

DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

SANOFI S.A.; AVENTIS PHARMA

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

S.A.; SANOFI US SERVICES INC. f/k/a LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT

SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC.; SANOFI-

AVENTIS U.S. LLC; HOSPIRA (ECF Nos. 19, 24) WORLDWIDE, LLC f/k/a HOSPIRA

WORLDWIDE, INC.; HOSPIRA, INC.;

PFIZER, INC., Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Rachael Wells’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 19) and the Parties’ Notice of Settlement and Request to Stay Proceedings (“Not.,” ECF No. 24). The Parties indicate that they have “reached an agreement in principle for the complete resolution of this matter.” Not. at 1. As they finalize a master settlement agreement resolving this case and other cases in multi-district 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.