Wells
Wells v. Sanofi S.A.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20243:23-cv-02134California717 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RACHAEL WELLS, Case No.: 23-CV-2134 JLS (BLM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER: (1) STAYING CASE; (2)
v. VACATING DEADLINES; AND (3)
DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
SANOFI S.A.; AVENTIS PHARMA
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
S.A.; SANOFI US SERVICES INC. f/k/a LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC.; SANOFI-
AVENTIS U.S. LLC; HOSPIRA (ECF Nos. 19, 24) WORLDWIDE, LLC f/k/a HOSPIRA
WORLDWIDE, INC.; HOSPIRA, INC.;
PFIZER, INC., Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Rachael Wells’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 19) and the Parties’ Notice of Settlement and Request to Stay Proceedings (“Not.,” ECF No. 24). The Parties indicate that they have “reached an agreement in principle for the complete resolution of this matter.” Not. at 1. As they finalize a master settlement agreement resolving this case and other cases in multi-district 26 …