Souza

Souza v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20243:21-cv-00316California1,775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 21-cv-316-BLM IRIS BERDINA SOUZA,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO

v. U.S.C. § 406(b)

MARTIN O’MALLEY,

Commissioner of Social Security, [ECF No. 19, 21] Defendant. 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s February 12, 2024, Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [ECF No. 19 (“Mot.”)] and Defendant’s February 14, 2024, response [ECF No. 21 (“Response”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND On February 22, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking judicial review of the denial of her claim for benefits. ECF No. 1. On December 21, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Voluntary Remand. ECF No. 14. On December 22, 2021, the Court granted the parties’ motion. ECF No. 15. On January 25, 2022, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.