Constellis
Johnson v. Constellis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO JOHNSON, an individual, Case No.: 3:22-cv-02066-W-VET
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT
CENTERRA GROUP LLC’S EX
CONSTELLIS, an unknown business
PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN
entity; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
IME
Defendants.
[Doc No. 19]
18 19 Before the Court is an “Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending Time for IME” (“Application”) by Defendant Centerra Group, LLC (“Centerra”). Doc. No. 19. Therein, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and 16(b)(4), Centerra requests the Court extend by sixty (60) days the time available for Plaintiff to undergo an independent medical examination (“IME”). Id. at 2. Per the operative scheduling order, all fact discovery must be completed by March 29, 2024. Doc. No. 15 at 4. Therefore, the Court construes…