Constellis

Johnson v. Constellis

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20243:22-cv-02066California959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO JOHNSON, an individual, Case No.: 3:22-cv-02066-W-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

CENTERRA GROUP LLC’S EX

CONSTELLIS, an unknown business

PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN

entity; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

IME

Defendants.

[Doc No. 19]

18 19 Before the Court is an “Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending Time for IME” (“Application”) by Defendant Centerra Group, LLC (“Centerra”). Doc. No. 19. Therein, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and 16(b)(4), Centerra requests the Court extend by sixty (60) days the time available for Plaintiff to undergo an independent medical examination (“IME”). Id. at 2. Per the operative scheduling order, all fact discovery must be completed by March 29, 2024. Doc. No. 15 at 4. Therefore, the Court construes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.