Sunderland

Sunderland v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20243:23-cv-01318California497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LINDA SUNDERLAND and Case No.: 3:23-cv-01318-JES-AHG

BENJAMIN BINDER,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT individually and on behalf of all others

MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

similarly situated,

TO CONTACT THE COURT

Plaintiffs, REGARDING DISCOVERY

DISPUTE

v.

PHARMACARE U.S., INC., et al., [ECF No. 42] Defendants. 19 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to extend the deadline to raise discovery disputes with the Court. ECF No. 42. Under the Court’s 45-Day Rule (see AHG.Chmb.R. at 2–3), the parties would have been required to bring any discovery dispute regarding Defendant’s responses to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests to the Court’s attention by March 23, 2024. The parties seek an order from the Court extending the deadline slightly. Parties seeking to continue deadlines must demonstrate good cause. Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.