Elliot

Elliot v. Spe Terra Nova Apartment Owners LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20243:24-cv-00447California779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 NELLY ELLIOTT, et al., Case No. 24-cv-0447-BAS-JLB 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SPE TERRA NOVA VILLAS

APARTMENT OWNERS, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 2) Defendants. 16 On March 6, 2024, Plaintiff Nelly Elliott, proceeding pro se, commenced this action. (ECF No. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff also filed an application seeking leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, also known as proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, an indigent litigant who is unable to pay the fees required to commence a legal action may petition a court to proceed without making such prepayment. The determination of indigency falls within the district court’s discretion. Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.