Augustine

Augustine v. Berryhill

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20243:17-cv-00238California605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRELL J. AUGUSTINE, Case No.: 17cv00238 JAH-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION IN ITS

ENTIRETY; GRANTING

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

Social Security, SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND Defendant. DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [ECF Nos. 13, 14, 31] 18 On February 8, 2017, Plaintiff Darrell J. Augustine filed a complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security, under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the Social Security Administration’s decision denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See ECF No. 1. Defendant filed an answer to the complaint along with the administrative record. ECF Nos. 10, 11. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.