Gonzalez Becerra v. ICE Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20243:24-cv-00070California1,439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS JONATHAN BONZALEZ Case No.: 3:24-cv-0070-JAH-KSC

BECERRA,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. [ECF No. 2] AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

ICE OFFICER, SAN YSIDRO

DETENTION CENTER, OTAY MESA

DETENTION CENTER, DO DUMO,

SHIELDS,

18 Defendants. 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Carlos Johnathan Gonzalez Becerra (“Plaintiff” or “Becerra”, a federal detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil action, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. Although Plaintiff’s Complaint is on a from for civil actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, because he is a detainee in federal custody and has named federal actors as defendants, the Court liberally construes Plaintiff’s claims to arise under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Narcotics Bureau, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 254, 255…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.