Gonzalez Becerra v. ICE Officer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS JONATHAN BONZALEZ Case No.: 3:24-cv-0070-JAH-KSC
BECERRA,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. [ECF No. 2] AND DISMISSING
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
ICE OFFICER, SAN YSIDRO
DETENTION CENTER, OTAY MESA
DETENTION CENTER, DO DUMO,
SHIELDS,
18 Defendants. 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Carlos Johnathan Gonzalez Becerra (“Plaintiff” or “Becerra”, a federal detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil action, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. Although Plaintiff’s Complaint is on a from for civil actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, because he is a detainee in federal custody and has named federal actors as defendants, the Court liberally construes Plaintiff’s claims to arise under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Narcotics Bureau, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 254, 255…