M.J.

M.J. v. La Maestra Family Clinic Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20243:23-cv-00395California1,707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23-cv-395-W-BLM M.J.,

Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING MANDATORY

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 16 On March 25, 2024, the Court conducted a Mandatory Settlement Conference in which the case did not settle; however, the Court and parties agreed that another Mandatory Settlement Conference would be beneficial. See ECF No. 35. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties appear for a Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) to be held via videoconference on September 3, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Barbara L. Major, United States Magistrate Judge. All discussions at the Mandatory Settlement Conference will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. Counsel for any non-English speaking party is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference. a. Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All parties, adjusters…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.