Quintana

Quintana v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20243:24-cv-00329California476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BALTAZAR FAVILA QUINTANA, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00329-RBM-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

v. TO REMAND COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 15 100, inclusive, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to limit plaintiff, Baltazar Favila Quintana’s damages and proposed order (“Stipulation”). (Doc. 6.) In the Stipulation, the parties stipulate “Plaintiff acknowledges that he claims damages in excess of $75,000.00.” (Id. ¶ 3.) However, the parties then stipulate “Plaintiff hereby agrees and stipulates that his damages, resulting from the alleged incident that occurred on defendant’s premises on or about May 10, 2022 that are the subject of the within action (formerly Imperial County Superior Court Case No.: ECU003212) (hereinafter “the litigation”) are hereby limited and capped at $74,999.99.” (Id. ¶ 5.) The parties stipulate “Plaintiff hereby agrees and stipulates that if his damages…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.