Grimes

Grimes v. Mossy Nissan Kearny Mesa

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20243:22-cv-01345California4,675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME L. GRIMES, Case Nos.: 22-CV-1345 TWR (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE

MOSSY NISSAN KEARNY MESA,

DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY,

Defendant. (2) DISMISSING CLAIMS WITH

AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

16 (3) GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

18 (ECF Nos. 11, 12) 19 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Jerome L. Grimes’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11 (“FAC”)), and Motion for Leave to File Documents Electronically (ECF No. 12 (“ECF Mot.”)). Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and has been granted in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status, the Court must screen his First Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s ECF Motion, DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Fair Housing Act claim,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.