Ewing

Ewing v. Haim

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-02275California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON A. EWING, Case No. 23-cv-2275-BAS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 12) BARUCH LEVY HAIM, et al., Defendants. 16

18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismiss the above-captioned action. (ECF No. 12.) Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a notice or stipulation, as described in Rule 41(a)(1)(A), and no court order is required. Stone v. Woodford, No. CIV-F-05-845…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.