Evans

Evans v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20243:23-cv-00883California827 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE EVANS, Case No. 23-cv-0883-BAS-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM (ECF No. 32) CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. 16

Pending before the Court is an ex parte motion by Plaintiff Jesse Evan’s Counsel to appoint Coleen Cusack as guardian ad litem for this matter. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff is a homeless adult living with paranoid schizophrenia. (Id.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion and appoints Coleen Cusack as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff for this matter. (Id.) 23 I. Legal Standard Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c)(1) requires that for individuals “with a representative,” the “following representatives may sue or defend on behalf of a minor or an incompetent person: (A) a general guardian; (B) a committee; (C) a conservator; or (D) a like fiduciary.” Rule 17(c)(2) establishes that “[t]he court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.