Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Mondelez Global LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-00057California1,371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL RODRIGUEZ, NEGEEN Case No.:23-cv-00057-DMS-AHG MIRREGHABIE, and CHRISTOPHER JENNEN, on behalf of themselves, all ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S others similarly situated, and the general MOTION FOR public, RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiffs, v.

MONDELĒZ GLOBAL LLC,

Defendant.

18 Pending before the Court is Defendant Mondelez Global LLC’s (“Defendant” or “MDLZ”) motion for reconsideration of the Court’s prior order granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition (ECF No. 33), and Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 37.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Defendant’s motion for reconsideration. I. BACKGROUND In this putative class action, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant MDLZ deceptively marketed and sold dark chocolate bars containing unsafe levels of lead and cadmium. MDLZ markets…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.