Walther-Meade

Walther-Meade v. Leidos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20243:22-cv-01777California557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE WALTHER-MEADE, an Case No.: 3:22-cv-01777-JAH-BLM individual,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE v. SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST

GEORGE WALTHER-MEADE FOR

LEIDOS, INC., a Delaware corporation; THE NAMED PLAINTIFF and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

15 Defendants/Counter Claimant. (ECF No. 37). 16 Pending before the Court is a Motion to Substitute George Walther-Meade as successor-in-interest to Plaintiff George Walther-Meade, who passed away on November 6, 2023. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 37). Defendant/Counter Claimant Leidos, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 38). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 governs this issue and provides: If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by 23 any party or by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.