Hernandez

Hernandez v. Cabrales

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20243:23-cv-01759California3,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA HERNANDEZ, Case No.: 23-CV-1759 TWR (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

OFFICER JOSEPH CABRALES,

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

Defendant. COMPLAINT, AND (2) REMINDING PARTIES OF

THEIR OBLIGATIONS UNDER

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE 11 AND 18 U.S.C.

18 § 1621(2) 19 (ECF No. 7)

Presently before the Court are Defendant Officer Joseph Cabrales’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 7) and Plaintiff Maria Hernandez’s Response (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 10). Defendant elected not to file a reply. (See generally Docket.) The Court vacated the hearing and took the Motion under submission on the papers pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (See ECF No. 12.) Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), the Parties’ arguments, and the relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.