Wilson

Wilson v. Hatch Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-00813California9,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMBER WILSON, individually and on Case No.: 23cv813-JES (MPP) behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

HATCH BANK,

ARBITRATION; and Defendant. 16 (2) DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

18 [ECF No. 7] 19 Pending before the Court is Defendant Hatch Bank’s (“Defendant”) Motion to 20 Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Complaint. ECF No. 7, “Mot.”. Plaintiff Amber 21 Wilson (“Plaintiff”) has filed a response in opposition to the Motion, ECF No. 9, 22 “Opp’n”, and Defendant has filed a reply. ECF No. 11, “Reply”. After a thorough review 23 of the record and the relevant case law, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court 24 GRANTS Hatch Bank’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and DISMISSES the case 25 without prejudice. 26 //// 27 //// 28 I. BACKGROUND On January 20, 2023, Wilson applied for a loan from Hatch Bank, a digital bank 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.