Hale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SUZI MARIE H., Case No.: 22-cv-1963-WQH-AHG

Plaintiff, ORDER v. 11 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 13 Defendant. 14 HAYES, Judge: 15 The matter before the Court is the review of the Report and Recommendation issued 16 by United States Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard, recommending that the 17 “Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits” be reversed and “remanding for further 18 administrative proceedings.” (ECF No. 20 at 46–47.) 19 The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 20 magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. 21 § 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 22 report ... to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in 23 part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 24 The district court need not review de novo those portions of a Report and Recommendation…