Sunderland

Sunderland v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-01318California1,395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LINDA SUNDERLAND and Case No.: 3:23-cv-01318-JES-AHG

BENJAMIN BINDER,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART individually and on behalf of all others

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND

similarly situated,

DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND

Plaintiffs, ISSUING FIRST AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

v.

PHARMACARE U.S., INC. and [ECF No. 44]

PHARMACARE LABORATORIES

PTY LTD.,

19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines. ECF No. 44. Plaintiffs seek a one-month continuance of the class expert disclosure deadlines, class discovery deadline, and class certification motion filing deadline. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order, or other deadlines set forth by the Court, must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 25 at 3 (Scheduling Order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.