Sunderland
Sunderland v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-01318California1,395 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LINDA SUNDERLAND and Case No.: 3:23-cv-01318-JES-AHG
BENJAMIN BINDER,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART individually and on behalf of all others
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
similarly situated,
DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND
Plaintiffs, ISSUING FIRST AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
PHARMACARE U.S., INC. and [ECF No. 44]
PHARMACARE LABORATORIES
PTY LTD.,
19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines. ECF No. 44. Plaintiffs seek a one-month continuance of the class expert disclosure deadlines, class discovery deadline, and class certification motion filing deadline. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order, or other deadlines set forth by the Court, must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 25 at 3 (Scheduling Order,…