Emert

Emert v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20243:23-cv-02318California986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROB EMERT, Case No.: 3:23-cv-2318-JES-VET

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

v. AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT

SAN DIEGO PROBATION

PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE

DEPARTMENT,

TO AMEND Respondent. 16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND On December 20, 2023, Petitioner submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. On January 2, 2024, the Court denied Petitioner’s IFP application and dismissed the Petition without prejudice. ECF No 5. The Court notified Petitioner that in order to have his case reopened, he must (1) either pay the filing fee or provide adequate proof of his inability to pay and (2) file a First Amended Petition curing the pleading deficiencies outlined in the Court’s Order, no later than February 16, 2024. See id. at 3. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.