Mayorkas

Al Badri v. Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20243:23-cv-01708California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAMZA A. AL BADRI; et. al., Case No.: 3:23-cv-01708-RBM-KSC

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 14 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS; et. al., 15 Defendants. 17 On September 15, 2023, Plaintiffs Hamza A. Al Badri, Ilham H. Sameen, and Ahmed Hamza Abed Al Badri (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint to Compel Agency Action under the APA and for Mandamus Relief (“Complaint”) against Defendants Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, and Madeline T. Kristoff (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 1.) On March 29, 2024, before Defendants answered the Complaint, Plaintiffs filed a Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiffs Without Court Order (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)) (“Voluntary Dismissal”). (Doc. 7.) Plaintiffs’ Voluntary Dismissal states, “Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, … hereby voluntarily dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.