Cooley

Cooley v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20243:22-cv-01754California1,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LINDA COOLEY, Case No. 22-cv-1754-MMA-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

AND SETTING BRIEFING

C.R. BARD, INC., et al.,

SCHEDULE

Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 41, 42] 15 16 17 18 On March 20, 2024, Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion seeking leave to file various exhibits, including confidential settlement communications and agreements, under seal. See Doc. No. 37. Because Defendants had not yet filed their underlying motion to enforce settlement agreement, or lodged the documents that were subject to their motion to seal on the docket, the Court denied the motion to seal without prejudice. See Doc. No. 40. On April 4, 2024, Defendants filed two identical motions to seal, now seeking leave to file both the motion to enforce settlement agreement and the supporting exhibits under seal. See Doc. Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.