Musgrove

Musgrove v. Curiel

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20243:23-cv-01613California4,247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRVIN MUSGROVE, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01613-RBM-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S HONORABLE GONZALO P. CURIEL, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendant.

(2) DISMISSING CASE ON

SCREENING PER 28 U.S.C. §

17 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) WITH PREJUDICE 18 [Doc. 2] 19 20 On September 1, 2023, Plaintiff Irvin Musgrove (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against The Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel, alleging violations of Plaintiff’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. (Doc. 1 (“Complaint”).) Along with his Complaint, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2.) The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP motion (Doc. 2) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.