Ahamed

Ahamed v. Navy Federal Credit Union

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-01726California2,672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDULLAH AHAMED, Case No. 23-cv-1726-BAS-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS (ECF No. 7)

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Defendant. 16 This case concerns a disputed payment of credit card debt. Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Abdullah Ahamed (“Plaintiff” or “Ahamed”) claims he paid his credit card debt to Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union (“Defendant” or “Navy Federal”) through a bill of exchange that Defendant did not properly credit to his account. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint. (ECF No. 7.) I. BACKGROUND As best as the Court can ascertain from the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges claims under multiple theories of liability concerning Defendant closing his credit card account and not applying an endorsed bill toward the balance on the account. The Court deduces from the material in the Complaint that Plaintiff had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.