Magee

Magee v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20243:20-cv-00548California1,192 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY MAGEE, Case No.: 20cv0548-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of

the Social Security Administration, [ECF No. 19] Defendant.

17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 19.) Defendant responded to the motion, stating that Defendant neither supports nor opposes Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 21.) For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint, seeking judicial review of the denial of her application for social security benefits. (ECF No. 1.) The parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over the case. (ECF No. 6.) On November 12, 2020, the Court granted the parties’ motion for voluntary remand pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.