Anthony

Anthony v. Segura

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20243:24-cv-00458California387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIAN ANTHONY, Case No. 24-cv-0458-BAS-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. TERMINATING AS MOOT JUDGE DANIEL SEGURA,

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

Defendant. DISMISS (ECF No. 7); AND

16 2. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

FILE ELECTRONICALLY

18 (ECF No. 10) 19 20 Motion to Dismiss. Presently before the Court are two items. First, Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint on various grounds, including the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and Younger abstention. (ECF No. 7.) The next day, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, exhausting his one opportunity to amend his pleading without the Court’s permission. (ECF No. 8.) A revised pleading replaces “the original complaint and renders it without legal effect.” Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012). Hence, the Court will terminate as moot Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and Defendant can reassert his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.