La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp v. Windy City Paletas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20243:24-cv-00631California3,042 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp., Case No. 2:23-cv-00279-CDS-DJA

Plaintiff Order Granting Motion to Transfer, Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss v. Without Prejudice, and Closing Case

Windy City Paletas, Inc., et al., [ECF Nos. 10, 11] Defendants

9 This is an intellectual property (IP) infringement action. Defendants Windy City Paletas, Inc., Ecuamex Paletas, Inc., Sky Limit Enterprise II, Inc., Arthuro Miranda, Kayla Rincon, and Digmey Jaramillo (collectively, “defendants”), move to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. ECF No. 10.1 Plaintiff La Michoacana opposes the motion. ECF No. 14. For the reasons herein, I grant defendants’ motion to transfer this case to the Southern District of California. Because this case will be transferred, I deny defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) without prejudice. I. Background La Michoacana is a vendor of paletas, a frozen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.