Sripetch
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20243:20-cv-01864California4,585 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 20-cv-01864-H-BGS
COMMISSION,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. REMEDIES AS TO DEFENDANT
SRIPETCH
ONGKARUCK SRIPETCH; AMANDA
FLORES; BREHNEN KNIGHT;
[Doc. No. 118.] ANDREW MCALPINE, ASHMIT
PATEL; MICHAEL WEXLER;
DOMINIC WILLIAMS; ADTRON INC.
a/k/a STOCKPALOOZA.COM; ATG
INC.; DOIT, LTD.; DOJI CAPITAL,
INC.; KING MUTUAL SOLUTIONS
INC.; OPTIMUS PRIME FINANCIAL
INC.; ORCA BRIDGE; REDLINE
21 INTERNATIONAL; and UAIM CORPORATION, Defendants. 24 On December 22, 2023, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) 25 filed a motion for remedies against Defendant Ongkaruck Sripetch. (Doc. No. 118.) On 26 February 29, 2024, Defendant Sripetch filed a response in opposition to the SEC’s motion 27 for remedies. (Doc. No. 142.) On March 7, 2024, the SEC filed a reply. (Doc. No. 145.) 28 The Court held a hearing on Plaintiff SEC’s…