Sripetch

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20243:20-cv-01864California4,585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 20-cv-01864-H-BGS

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. REMEDIES AS TO DEFENDANT

SRIPETCH

ONGKARUCK SRIPETCH; AMANDA

FLORES; BREHNEN KNIGHT;

[Doc. No. 118.] ANDREW MCALPINE, ASHMIT

PATEL; MICHAEL WEXLER;

DOMINIC WILLIAMS; ADTRON INC.

a/k/a STOCKPALOOZA.COM; ATG

INC.; DOIT, LTD.; DOJI CAPITAL,

INC.; KING MUTUAL SOLUTIONS

INC.; OPTIMUS PRIME FINANCIAL

INC.; ORCA BRIDGE; REDLINE

21 INTERNATIONAL; and UAIM CORPORATION, Defendants. 24 On December 22, 2023, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) 25 filed a motion for remedies against Defendant Ongkaruck Sripetch. (Doc. No. 118.) On 26 February 29, 2024, Defendant Sripetch filed a response in opposition to the SEC’s motion 27 for remedies. (Doc. No. 142.) On March 7, 2024, the SEC filed a reply. (Doc. No. 145.) 28 The Court held a hearing on Plaintiff SEC’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.