Betts

Betts v. Mendivil

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20243:23-cv-00907California5,838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMENIC JARELLE BETTS Case No.: 3:23-cv-00907-LL-BGS

CDCR #AM-3604,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

F. MENDIVIL, Correctional Officer; M. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

16 PALMER, Grievance Coordinator; C. COMPLAINT [ECF No. 25] ROJAS, Grievance Coordinator; L. URENA, Correctional Sergeant; 18 LAROCCO, Correctional Officer; HILL, Warden,

20 Defendants. 21 Domenic Jarelle Betts, (“Plaintiff” or “Betts”), currently incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) located in Soledad, California is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (ECF No. 10, FAC.) Plaintiff alleges that Defendants, the present warden of the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), and five RJD correctional officers violated Plaintiff’s rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.