Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20243:20-cv-00958California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OMNITRACS, LLC AND XRS Case No.: 20-cv-958-CAB-DDL

CORPORATION,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

Plaintiffs, FOR IPR ESTOPPEL [Doc. No. 383] v.

PLATFORM SCIENCE, INC.,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiffs Omnitracs LLC and XRS Corporation (jointly “Omnitracs”) allege 18 defendant Platform Science, Inc. infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,925,308 (‘308 patent). 19 Platform Science petitioned for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of the ‘308 patent. The 20 challenged claims of the ‘308 patent were not found unpatentable. 21 Omnitracs now moves for an order estopping Platform Science from contending in 22 these District Court proceedings any invalidity ground Platform Science raised or 23 reasonably could have raised during the IPR. See U.S.C. § 315(e)(2); see also 24 California Inst. of Tech. v. Broadcom Ltd., 25 F.4th 976, 991 (Fed. Cir. 2022) (estoppel 25 applies to all grounds that “reasonably could have been asserted against the claims included 26 in the petition”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.