Morton

Morton v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20243:21-cv-01428California2,491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN MORTON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-1428-MMA-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED

COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 202] 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants County of San Diego and Janine Sparks’ motion to dismiss. Doc. No. 202. Plaintiffs Marilyn Morton and Dean Morton filed a response in opposition, to which the moving defendants replied. See Doc. Nos. 208, 209. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 212. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion. BACKGROUND The Court has issued several substantive orders detailing Plaintiffs’ factual allegations, see, e.g., Doc. Nos. 18, 27, 185, which have essentially never varied. So the Court does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.