Ambert
Ambert v. Stafford
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20243:22-cv-00996California681 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENE AMBERT, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00996-RBM-DEB
FL DOC #A50783,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Petitioner, MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF vs. COUNSEL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
[Doc. 43]
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
GENERAL M. GARLAND; UNITED
STATES MARSHAL SERVICE;
MARSHALL STEVEN C.
STAFFORD; and FEDERAL BUREAU
OF INVESTIGATION,
19 Respondents. 20 21 On February 20, 2024, Petitioner/Plaintiff Gene Ambert (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (“Motion”). (Doc. 43.) In his Motion, Plaintiff contends that this is a complex case of constitutional magnitude that requires the assignment of counsel. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff contends that he has “written for pro-bono counsel or [a] 26 27 28 1 para-legal with either negative or ‘no response’ from those contacted, including law schools.” (Id.) Plaintiff also contends that the law clerks at Blackwater River Correctional and…