Ambert

Ambert v. Stafford

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20243:22-cv-00996California681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENE AMBERT, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00996-RBM-DEB

FL DOC #A50783,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Petitioner, MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF vs. COUNSEL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

[Doc. 43]

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

GENERAL M. GARLAND; UNITED

STATES MARSHAL SERVICE;

MARSHALL STEVEN C.

STAFFORD; and FEDERAL BUREAU

OF INVESTIGATION,

19 Respondents. 20 21 On February 20, 2024, Petitioner/Plaintiff Gene Ambert (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (“Motion”). (Doc. 43.) In his Motion, Plaintiff contends that this is a complex case of constitutional magnitude that requires the assignment of counsel. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff contends that he has “written for pro-bono counsel or [a] 26 27 28 1 para-legal with either negative or ‘no response’ from those contacted, including law schools.” (Id.) Plaintiff also contends that the law clerks at Blackwater River Correctional and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.