Ramirez

Ramirez v. Pratt

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20243:24-cv-00232California271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 || Martin Elpidio Ponce RAMIREZ, Case No.: 24-cv-0232-AGS-KSC Petitioner,] ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF PETITION AS A MOTION TO

AMEND IN PETITIONER’S

6 || Glen E. PRATT, Warden, EXISTING HABEAS MATTER, Respondent DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO

P ‘| PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(ECF 2), AND CLOSING CASE Proceeding without an attorney, petitioner Martin Elpidio Ponce Ramirez has filed petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He both paid the filing fee and filed a motion to 11 || proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF 2; ECF 3.) His petition challenges the same San Diego 12 || Superior Court conviction (under state criminal case number SCN398344) as does another 13 || of his habeas petitions already pending in this Court in Ramirez v. Pratt, No. 23-cv-2175- 14 || JLS-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2024). When a prisoner, proceeding pro se, files a second habeas …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.