Ramirez

Ramirez v. Pratt

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20243:23-cv-02175California1,983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN PONCE RAMIREZ, Case No.: 23-CV-2175 JLS (KSC)

Petitioner,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

v. AMEND PETITION AND (2)

DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED

GLEN E. PRATT, Warden,

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Respondent. (ECF No. 6) 16 On November 24, 2023, Petitioner Martin Ponce Ramirez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See ECF No. 1. On December 5, the Court dismissed the case without prejudice based on Petitioner’s failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement and failure to exhaust all claims in the Petition. See ECF No. 2. The Court notified Petitioner that to proceed with the instant habeas case, he must, on or before January 25, 2024, pay the $5.00 filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and also choose one of the four options outlined, which included: (1) demonstrate exhaustion, (2) voluntarily dismiss the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.