Ambert

Ambert v. Stafford

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20243:22-cv-00996California1,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENE AMBERT, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00996-RBM-DEB

FL DOC #A50783,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Petitioner, MOTION FOR COURT ORDER FOR vs. ACCESS TO INSTITUION (BRCF) LAW

LIBRARY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

[Doc. 45] GENERAL M. GARLAND; UNITED

STATES MARSHAL SERVICE;

MARSHALL STEVEN C.

STAFFORD; and FEDERAL BUREAU

OF INVESTIGATION,

19 Respondents.

21 On February 20, 2024, Petitioner/Plaintiff Gene Ambert (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Court Order for Access to Institution (BRCF) Law Library (“Motion”). (Doc. 45.) In his Motion, Plaintiff requests an order to ensure his “due process and constitutional right to ‘access to the court’ … to allow prep of basis motions in compliance with rules of the court and applicable law.” (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff asserts that 10 hours per week constitutes reasonable access to the law library and that previous courts have found that 11 hours per week meets the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.