Shallowhorn

Shallowhorn v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20243:23-cv-01273California1,458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Alfred E. SHALLOWHORN, Case No.: 23-cv-1273-AGS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF 9)

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND,

DENYING AS MOOT OTHER

R. LOPEZ, et al.,

MOTIONS (ECF 12 & 13), AND Defendants. CLOSING CASE 8 After his third unsuccessful bite at the apple, the second amended complaint of incarcerated pro se plaintiff Alfred E. Shallowhorn is dismissed without leave to amend. A. Standard of Review In conducting the required screening of Shallowhorn’s complaint, the Court must dismiss any portion that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from immune defendants. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126– (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (discussing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)); Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)). B. Shallowhorn’s Allegations The second amended complaint alleges the same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.