Lua

Lua v. McNett

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20243:23-cv-00032California6,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 23CV32-JAH(BLM) SALVADOR LUA,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. [ECF NO. 21] IAN MCNETT AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s March 4, 2024 Motion to Compel Discovery [ECF No. 21-1 (“MTC”)], Defendants’ March 11, 2024 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 22 (“Oppo.”)], and Plaintiff’s March 18, 2024 Reply [ECF No. 23 (“Reply”)]. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1; see also MTC at 1. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on February 12, 2024 alleging (1) violation of the Bane Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1; (2) negligence; (3) liability under Monell v. Department of Social Services of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978); and (4) excessive force. ECF No. 18. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that on August 31, 2019, after suspecting him off unlocking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.