Biological Dynamics, Inc. v. Exokeryx, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20243:23-cv-01664California431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 23cv1664 DMS (JLB)

BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS, INC.,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN

EXOKERYX, INC.,

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

Defendant. ANSWER/RESPOND TO THE

COMPLAINT

15 16 This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s ex parte application for an extension of time to answer or respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff opposes the application. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) states, “When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (a) with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires[.]” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A). “’Good cause’ is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.