Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE I and JANE DOE II, on Case No.: 23-cv-01424-AJB-BLM behalf of themselves and all others 12 similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 21) v. DAVITA INC., Defendant.

17 Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Davita Inc.’s motion to dismiss 18 Plaintiffs Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II’s First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) 19 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 21.) Plaintiffs filed an 20 opposition to the motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 25), to which Defendant replied, (Doc. No. 21 26). The parties have also each respectively filed a notice of supplemental authority. (Doc. 22 Nos. 28, 29.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the instant matter 23 suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. For the reasons stated 24 herein, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ FAC. 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are California residents …