Magiary

Magiary v. Kia America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20243:23-cv-01935California326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MAGIARY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-1935-BAS-BLM

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 13) KIA AMERICA, INC., Defendant. 16

18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismiss the above-captioned action. (ECF No. 13.) Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a notice or stipulation, as described in Rule 41(a)(1)(A), and no court order is required. Stone v. Woodford, No. CIV-F-05-845 AWI-DLB,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.