U.S. Public v. People in US

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20243:24-cv-00369California531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 U.S. PUBLIC, et al., Case No. 24-cv-0369-BAS-VET

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

PEOPLE IN U.S., et al.,

JURISDICTION

Defendants.

17 On February 26, 2024, Plaintiffs Steven Cross and Sandara Jenkins commenced this 18 action pro se against Defendants Ann Busby, Liz Hackett, the California Department of 19 Real Estate Governors, and Does 1 to 1 billion. (ECF No. 1.) On March 27, 2024, the 20 Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack 21 of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiffs have not responded to the Order. 22 “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. 23 Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). “They possess only that power authorized by 24 Constitution and statute, which is not to be expanded by judicial decree.” Id. (internal 25 citations omitted). “It is to be presumed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.