Ahamed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ABDULLAH AHAMED, Case No. 23-cv-1726-BAS-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Defendant. 15 Plaintiff Abdullah Ahamed, proceeding pro se, filed this case concerning a disputed payment of his credit card debt. (See generally Compl., ECF No. 1.) Subsequently, Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint principally on the grounds that Plaintiff’s Complaint did not state a plausible claim to relief. (See generally ECF No. 7.) On March 29, 2024, the Court granted this motion to dismiss because it concluded Plaintiff had not alleged facts sufficiently plausible to plead any of his claims. (Dismissal Order, ECF No. 14.) However, the Court gave Plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint and correct the deficient claims on or before April 19, 2024. (Id. at 8:12–13.) Now, April 19, 2024, has come and gone…