Roditi

Roditi v. New River Investments Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20243:20-cv-01908California4,080 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL RODITI and VENICE Case No.: 3:20-cv-01908-RBM-MSB

BEJARANO,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO EXCLUDE v. DEFENDANTS’ LATE-PRODUCED

INVESTMENT ADVISORY

NEW RIVER INVESTMENTS INC., et CONTRACTS AS MOOT AND al.,

GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

16 Defendants. REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS 17 [Doc. 145, 170]

20 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Manuel Roditi and Venice Bejarano’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to exclude Defendant New River Investments, Inc., Alberto Roditi, and Guillermo Roditi Dominguz’s (collectively, “Defendants”) late produced investment advisory contracts (“Motion”) (Doc. 145) and Plaintiffs’ subsequent request for monetary sanctions (Doc. 163, January 29, 2024 Transcript of Status Hearing 11:17–12:7; Doc. 170). The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.