Antar

Antar v. Lexington National Insurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20243:23-cv-01685California3,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE ANTAR, Case No. 23-cv-1685-BAS-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 54) LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP., et al., 15 Defendants. 16

Pending before the Court is Defendant Lexington National Insurance Corporation’s (“Lexington”) Motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss this action. (ECF No. 54.) Plaintiff George Antar filed this action seeking declarative and injunctive relief to prevent the sale of his property to fulfill an indemnity obligation claimed by Defendant related to a forfeited criminal bond. (FAC, ECF No. 7.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 54.) The Court further GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend his Amended Complaint. 25 I. Factual Background This matter results from the forfeiture of a criminal bond. In March 2019, Akrum Alrahib was indicted on charges of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.