Moore

Moore v. Pacific View Apartments Carlsbad LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20243:23-cv-00826California3,229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

23 On May 4, 2023, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint along with a 24 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a motion for appointment of counsel. 25 (ECF Nos. 1-3). On May 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 26 4). On June 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for hearing on the merits of her action and 27 a request for an injunction. (ECF No. 5). On June 27, 2023, the Court dismissed the first 28 amended complaint without prejudice, denied the IFP as moot, denied the motion for a ruling on the merits as moot, and denied the request for an injunction as moot. (ECF No. 6). The Court permitted Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint on or before August 1, 2023. Id. On July 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint along with another IFP motion and motion to appoint counsel. (ECF Nos. 8-10). On September 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed an expedited motion to supplement the pleading. (ECF No. 11). On November 1, 2023, the Court dismissed the second amended complaint without prejudice, granted the IFP, denied the motion to appoint counsel as moot, and denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.