Gargano

Gargano v. Plus One Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20243:22-cv-00735California6,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22-cv-00735-DMS-MMP AMBER GARGANO,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

PLUS ONE HOLDINGS, INC.,

14 Defendant.

16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for new trial. (ECF No. 101.) A jury trial on Plaintiff’s claims for disability discrimination resulted in a verdict in favor of Defendant, Plus One Holdings, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Plus One”) on all counts. Plaintiff Amber Gargano (“Plaintiff” or “Gargano”) now moves for a new trial arguing that the verdict runs against the clear weight of the evidence and that Defendant’s misconduct at trial impacted the jury’s ability to reach a fair verdict. Defendant filed an opposition (ECF No. 107) to which Plaintiff replied (ECF No. 108). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following is a summary of the full factual background…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.