Clinton

Clinton v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20243:23-cv-01471California8,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARKEITH CLINTON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01471-CAB-SBC

CDCR #AY-1315,

SCREENING ORDER RE FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. 13 1) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary of ALLISON, MADDEN, BUCKEL, CDCR; RAY MADDEN, Warden;

STEADMAN, FERNANDEZ AND

R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden;

DOE 1‒10 AS PARTIES

S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden;

C. ALLEN, Sergeant; COLON, Officer;

2) DISMISSING SPECIFIED A. FERNANDEZ, Officer; DOE 1‒10;

CAUSES OF ACTION FOR FAILING

JOHN DOE 1‒3; JANE DOE 4,

TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT Defendants. TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) 19 AND 1915A(b)

AND

3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL

TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON

DEFENDANTS ALLEN AND

COLON PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 26 Before the Court is Plaintiff Markeith Clinton’s First Amended Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.