Clinton
Clinton v. Allison
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20243:23-cv-01471California8,500 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARKEITH CLINTON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01471-CAB-SBC
CDCR #AY-1315,
SCREENING ORDER RE FIRST
Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. 13 1) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary of ALLISON, MADDEN, BUCKEL, CDCR; RAY MADDEN, Warden;
STEADMAN, FERNANDEZ AND
R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden;
DOE 1‒10 AS PARTIES
S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden;
C. ALLEN, Sergeant; COLON, Officer;
2) DISMISSING SPECIFIED A. FERNANDEZ, Officer; DOE 1‒10;
CAUSES OF ACTION FOR FAILING
JOHN DOE 1‒3; JANE DOE 4,
TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT Defendants. TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) 19 AND 1915A(b)
AND
3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL
TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON
DEFENDANTS ALLEN AND
COLON PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 26 Before the Court is Plaintiff Markeith Clinton’s First Amended Complaint…