Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE WALKER, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-264-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) DENYING MOTION TO STRYKER CORPORATION, et al.,

AMEND THE SCHEDULING

Defendants. ORDER;

16 2) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL; and

3) SUA SPONTE VACATING THE

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

AND RELATED DEADLINES

21 [Dkt. Nos. 95, 98]

23 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 95] and the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order to Continue Trial Date and Contingent Deadlines [Dkt. No. 98]. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion to amend the pretrial schedule and GRANTS IN PART the motion to compel. / / / I. BACKGROUND Fact discovery in this matter closed on November 7, 2022. Dkt. No. 37. Following Judge Anello’s ruling on Defendants’ …