Ramsey

Ramsey v. Corronado

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20243:22-cv-01859California3,480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 DANIEL CHRIS RAMSEY, Case No. 22-cv-1859-MMA (MMP)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v.

DENYING REQUEST FOR IN

J. CORONADO, et al.,

CAMERA REVIEW;

Defendants.

GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

AS TO DEFENDANT MOSELEY;

and

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

AS TO DEFENDANTS CORONADO

AND ORTIZ

[Doc. No. 34, 35] On January 27, 2023, Plaintiff Daniel Ramsey, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) and a civil rights complaint pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging Defendants violated his First Amendment rights when they seized his mail and confiscated photographs they claimed violated the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (“CDCR”) policy prohibiting inmates from receiving sexually explicit material. See Doc. No. 6. Plaintiff named Assistant Captain J. Coronado,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.