Neill

Neill v. YMCA of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20243:23-cv-00457California5,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGEL MICHAEL NEILL, Case No.: 23-CV-457 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

YMCA OF SAN DIEGO,

COMPLAINT

Defendant. (ECF No. 27)

Presently before the Court are Defendant YMCA of San Diego’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 27); Memorandum of Points and Authorities (“Mem.,” ECF No. 27-1); and Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN,” ECF No. 27-3). Plaintiff Angel Michael Neill submitted an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 32), to which Defendant replied (“Reply,” ECF No. 33). The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). ECF No. 31. Having carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 24), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.